VERDICT IMMINENT – Does Not Bode Well for Vanguard

In General

Frank Report has just learned that the jury in the case of the U.S. v Raniere has reached its verdict in the case – and will be brought back into the courtroom at 2:30 PM to make the announcement. We will be providing an update as soon as possible but, given the numerous charges involved in this case, this does not bode well for Keith Alan Raniere AKA The Vanguard AKA Master AKA Grandmaster.

Normally, in this type of complex case involving multiple charges, the longer the jury is out, the more likely that the defendant will be found innocent – at least on some counts. But with this type of quick turnaround – less than 5 hours of deliberations – it will be shocking if this is not a “GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS” verdict.

Viva Executive Success!

 

Here is the jury charge sheet:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – -X
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
– against –
KEITH RANIERE,
also known as “Vanguard,”
“Grandmaster,”
and “Master,”
Defendant.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – -X

18-CR-204 (S-2) (NGG)
VERDICT SHEET
AS TO COUNT TWO
Racketeering
How do you find the defendant?
Guilty _________ Not Guilty _________
If you answered “Guilty” as to Count Two, indicate whether the following Racketeering Acts
were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. If you answered “Not Guilty,” proceed to Count
One.
Case 1:18-cr-00204-NGG-VMS Document 729 Filed 06/18/19 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 7150
2
Racketeering Act 1
1A (Conspiracy to Commit Identity Theft – Ashana Chenoa)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
1B (Conspiracy to Unlawfully Possess Identification Document)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
Racketeering Act 2 (Sexual Exploitation of a Child on November 2, 2005 – Camila)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
Racketeering Act 3 (Sexual Exploitation of a Child on November 24, 2005 – Camila)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
Racketeering Act 4 (Possession of Child Pornography)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
Racketeering Act 5
5A (Conspiracy to Commit Identity Theft)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
5B (Identity Theft – James Loperfido)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
5C (Identity Theft – Edgar Bronfman)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
Racketeering Act 6 (Conspiracy to Alter Records for Use in an Official Proceeding)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
Racketeering Act 7 (Conspiracy to Commit Identity Theft – Marianna)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
Case 1:18-cr-00204-NGG-VMS Document 729 Filed 06/18/19 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 7151
3
Racketeering Act 8
8A (Trafficking for Labor and Services – Daniela)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
8B (Document Servitude – Daniela)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
Racketeering Act 9 (Extortion)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
Racketeering Act 10
10A (Sex Trafficking – Nicole)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
10B (Forced Labor – Nicole)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
Racketeering Act 11 (Conspiracy to Commit Identity Theft – Pamela Cafritz)
Proved _________ Not Proved _________
AS TO COUNT ONE
Racketeering Conspiracy
How do you find the defendant?
Guilty _________ Not Guilty _________
AS TO COUNT THREE
Forced Labor Conspiracy
How do you find the defendant?
Guilty _________ Not Guilty _________
Case 1:18-cr-00204-NGG-VMS Document 729 Filed 06/18/19 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 7152
4
AS TO COUNT FOUR
Wire Fraud Conspiracy
How do you find the defendant?
Guilty _________ Not Guilty _________
AS TO COUNT FIVE
Sex Trafficking Conspiracy
How do you find the defendant?
Guilty _________ Not Guilty _________
AS TO COUNT SIX
Sex Trafficking of Nicole
How do you find the defendant?
Guilty _________ Not Guilty _________
If you find the defendant guilty as to Count Six, answer the following questions:
Do you find that the defendant knew means of force, fraud or coercion would be used
to cause one or more persons to engage in one or more commercial sex acts?
Yes _________ No _________
AS TO COUNT SEVEN
Attempted Sex Trafficking of Jay
How do you find the defendant?
Guilty _________ Not Guilty _________
__________________ ____________________________
DATE FOREPERSON
Case 1:18-cr-00204-NGG-VMS Document 729 Filed 06/18/19 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 7153

 

Join Our Newsletter!

Love Daynight? We love to tell you about our new stuff. Subscribe to newsletter!

You may also read!

Toni Natalie and Catherine Oxenberg Cheer Up Media After US Attorney Donoghue Is Cheered

It’s only the beginning. There is more to come, with additional prosecutions of Nxivm players likely. In the meantime,

Read More...

Fred: J. Z. Knight Stole Her Bogus Ramtha Act

Editor’s Note: Our correspondent, Fred is back, offering more details on the curious claims of

Read More...

DOJ Release: EDNY Gives Thanks to DO-Nothing NDNY [Thanks for Nothing]

Readers might enjoy the press release for the Department of Justice, US Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of New York

Read More...

22 commentsOn VERDICT IMMINENT – Does Not Bode Well for Vanguard

Leave a Reply to shadowstate1958 Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Mobile Sliding Menu